Showing posts with label Bernie Sanders. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bernie Sanders. Show all posts

Taking Unnecessary Classes in School


Anyone who went to college probably had to take classes that were irrelevant to their degree or career path. This seems like a minor inconvenience, but there's more to this. Taking unnecessary classes, specifically general education courses, doesn't help college students, but holds them back. The same goes for high school. One student may flourish in U.S. history, another excels in mathematics, and a different student thrives in writing. Most students know their career paths, but taking unnecessary classes makes it that much harder for them to succeed. Taking gen ed, or any unnecessary courses, doesn't help students.

Most pointless classes are usually Leftist run. My sister has completed her first semester in college. One class she had to take is "What is a good life?" UF requires all freshmen to take this. Either you take this course, or you can take a “Quest course,” which fulfills the requirement. There are multiple quest courses, like Lying and Deception, Fairytales, Idea of Happiness (which my sister took), etc. Her class was very Leftist run. None of what was taught in class had ANYTHING to do with Accounting (her major), yet she was required to take this class. These Leftist professors are shoving their biases down freshmen’s throats, which leads to more Leftists. Another issue is how these classes can drop students’ GPA. If a student is looking to go to medical school, that may not happen because they got a B+ in a stupid, but difficult class. These classes 1) cause a student’s GPA to unnecessarily drop (compared to when you’re in a class like Business Finance), which 2) can hold students back. Taking unnecessary classes hurts academic success.

Because these classes have nothing to do with your career path, ultimately, its money being wasted. What skills do you gain from knowing what is a good life? It’s also a waste of time and resources. Instead of those first two years being wasted on useless classes, why not have relevant classes or a work experience program. Students would be able to either get experience or get knowledge to help them. Why do colleges teach skills already taught in high school? Students don’t need reminders; they need to⁸ be taught information related to their major. College is expensive. In Florida, college costs a little over $6,000 per year, so by the end of two years, a student will owe $12,000+, and the money used here will be wasted on courses that are irrelevant to a student’s major. As previously stated, why not allow students to find courses that are tailored to their career choices? 

I was inspired by Mahgdalen Rose’s video, where she focused on how high schools limit students’ capabilities by making them take courses they don’t need. It falls in line with what I am discussing. Who uses the Pythagorean Theorem in their everyday life? Who dissects animals on a daily basis (unless you’re Jeffery Dahmer)? I would assume few do. Why don’t high schools let students take courses that relate to their field of study? In the video, she explains how she excelled in writing and history, but fell short in math and science. One in the same for me. Instead of making students take all these classes, they should have the freedom of choosing their desired classes. Dual enrollment helped me realize what I wanted to do scholastically, not high school.


Something I want to emphasize on is why student debt is so high. Colleges charge a ton of money; students waste their money taking these classes! Bernie Sanders, Ilhan Omar, and Elizabeth Warren constantly complain how student debt should be cancelled, but did it occur to them that a reason is because students’ money is wasted on these classes? If they really wanted to help student debt, they would encourage colleges to get rid of gen ed classes that don’t help students in their degree. A college student will have thousands owed by the time they’re done with only the first two years in college, and they’ll still have another two years they have to pay thousands. Why not make it so students can save money and not go into debt by removing these classes? Or that students take gen ed courses aimed towards their degree? Excellent solutions!

Colleges are a money-making business. “These classes will help students discover what they want to do,” they say. Colleges have students take these courses so they can get money, while students pay hundreds for this. If colleges were concerned about students’ education, they wouldn’t have them take these classes, and let them focus on their major specifically, like I said? If a student is a business major, why make them take science courses? Colleges just want the money, so they push for 4-year degrees. That’s a major problem schools have, but considering they’re mainly Leftist, it’s really not shocking they only care about making money. That’s why the solution I provided isn’t considered in discussing debt. 

Students shouldn’t have to take unnecessary classes. And it's not just colleges doing this, its middle and high school: one middle school textbook has their students learning kinky and provocative sex. It just causes them to lose money, time and resources. Where they could be getting knowledge for their careers, they’re wasting time in these pointless classes. Student debt is so high largely because students have to waste money in these classes. If any politician really wants to solve the crisis, they would consider all of what I said, and have colleges remove these classes from a student’s degree audit. Instead of holding students back, let them focus on what matters: classes that will provide knowledge and skills for the field they are studying.

What do you think of these types of classes? Are they unnecessary? Comment what you think!

Sources:

Bad news: Trump was impeached by the House. Read this: https://youngpatriotrising.blogspot.com/2019/12/impeachment-hoax.html. Don't worry. It's very upsetting, but it's in God's hands! 
Good news: I finished this semester with a 3.5 GPA! A in Family Communication, B+ in International Business & Sales Management! 

Giving Prisoners The Right To Vote

Original Image from
https://thehill.com/hilltv
/what-americas-thinking/441863-
poll-69-percent-of-voters-
say-prisoners-shouldnt-be-allowed-to
I've been meaning to write about this, but many other topics came to mind for me to write about, but I have chosen this topic for this week's discussion. Bernie Sanders, a few months back, announced that people who are in prison should have the right to vote. Not only those with a few months or years, those who are in prison for LIFE. He believes that "Under the Constitution, everyone has the right to vote." Some Republicans and Democrats are very much on board with this, while those of us with common sense think this is a HORRIBLE IDEA. The minute you committed the crime, you chose your destiny. Somehow, I should be "on board" with a convicted killer voting for what happens to my future? Because let's be honest: if those who vote are in prison for life, what happens to the rest of the country doesn't really affect them. For this discussion, I'm going to talk about why prisoners (i.e. serial rapists/killers - not getting out of prison) should not have the right to vote. More specifically, I don’t think someone should be able to vote from prison.

Bernie said, "In my state, what we do is separate. You're paying a price, you committed a crime, you're in jail. That's bad," he said. "But you're still living in American society and you have a right to vote. I believe in that, yes, I do." I found this on an article on Business Insider. I'll leave the link at the end. He also believes someone like the Boston Marathon Bomber, who set off 2 bombs at the Boston Marathon, which killed 5 total and injured several others, should be able to vote. I don’t know why people listen to this old fool on politics, considering he claims to be a socialist, yet owns 3 houses! Hypocrisy from the Left at its finest. Somehow this murderer "deserves the right to vote?" What about his victims? Didn't they deserve the right to vote and the right to life? But now they can't, because of one person's selfish decision. Why should he get the right to vote when these people LOST their rights from murder? Watch this video from TPUSA of a Boston Marathon Bombing survivor who literally states the obvious: MURDERERS SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO VOTE. EVER!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_DvCo4LR3E

Image result for boston marathon bombing
Original Image from
https://www.reuters.com/news
/picture/flashback-boston-marathon-
bombings-idUSRTX5OFPE
Honestly, I feel like this shouldn't even be a discussion. A murderer having the right to vote? A rapist having the right to vote? Why are we even talking about this! Graham Allen said it well, and I left the link to the video: under the Constitution, we are guaranteed "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness." That's the order. Convicted killers do not care about life, the most important of all these, because without the first, you can't have the rest. Convicted killers or convicted rapists lost their rights when they committed the crime. Even though prison means you gave up your rights (1A, 2A, 4A), life is NOT bad in prison. You get three meals a day, a roof over your head, showers, television, etc. Life is still good! You're just in prison. Prison, defined by Cambridge University, is a place where criminals are kept as a punishment. When you commit a crime, you chose to give up these freedoms. No going around it.

The main issue I, as well as MANY others have with this ideology, is that NO one considers the victims. The survivors all say this is an awful idea, so why is this still relevant? Those who were brutally murdered cannot say, “Hey, this person killed me, so they shouldn’t have any rights to vote, since I lost mine!” Instead, you’ve got a joke of a politician like Sanders who implies, “Screw those who died! Let the evil men and women vote!” How insulting. Not only this, but it also insults those who serve to protect this country from acts of terrorism, like law enforcement, the Navy, the Army, etc. Instead of combating terrorism, both outside and inside the U.S., Democrats want America to be vulnerable to terrorist attacks. Milo Yiannopoulos said it correctly, America didn’t learn from 9/11. If we keep going on this path of supporting Ilhan Omar (or anyone like her), and care about open borders or letting convicted felons vote, worst versions of terrorism WILL happen. The Pulse Nightclub shooting is a prime example.

Now, let me make one thing clear: those for minimal charges, I think, could have the possibility of having their voting rights repealed. Those are likely to be the ones who turn over a new leaf. Those who murder or rape innocent people DO NOT deserve these rights. If they’re lucky to not get the death penalty, they should suffer in prison for the rest of their life. Their victims will not be able to speak against what was done to them. I’ve asked on Twitter and some people said they think if the person has rehabilitated, they should get that right restored. I can understand that, but in my opinion, if you do the crime, YOU chose to give up those rights. No one took them away, but your selfish decision. Some people think if you commit small crimes and are more likely get out, they think that person should be able to vote. Those who commit large crimes, like murder, do not deserve the right to vote.

Many agree that the reason Democrats are pushing for this is because they are desperate for votes. That’s why they want 16-year olds, illegal aliens, and prisoners to have the “right” to vote. Because what do these groups have in common? They are easily influenced, and easy to push in the Democrats’ direction. It’s all about what will keep these people in power and keep the money rolling in. At the end of the day, the Democrats have an underlying ideology for America: to have the people COMPLETELY dependent on the government, and certain people (i.e. Bernie Sanders, Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters, Chuck Schumer) AKA the elites, be in control of the people and wealth. This next election isn’t about Republican versus Democrat; it’s about Freedom versus Oppression. But going back to my original point, I think someone who committed small acts, who will probably be out in a few years’ time, could be able to vote., knowing they are rehabilitated. Those who committed horrible acts, again, DO NOT DESERVE THE RIGHT TO VOTE. You are free to think how you want about this issue, but this is how I feel.

What do you think? Comment down below!! Keep it friendly, we can agree/disagree without harsh comments or offensive statements being said.

Check out these sites:
Image result for university of florida logo
Original Image came from Google
NEWSFLASH: Daniel Weldon, a student at the University of Florida (my University), was enjoying the 4th of July with his friends, and decided to get something to eat. Upon entering the restaurant, these girls (I think 4-8), as well as some guys, just started cursing him out, calling him awful names, shoving/pushing him, etc. For what you may ask? For wearing a MAGA hat and pin. They verbally and physically attacked him, while the staff just stood there and did nothing. When he tried to report this to the police, they honestly didn’t care, as this was a regular occurrence. THIS is why the Left cannot win. Attacking a guy who wasn’t causing ANY trouble, just because his hat and pin offended you? And then the police and staff of the restaurant not doing a thing about it! Even patrons who had opposing views on politics or observed what happened said they hated how he was treated, and intended on voting Republican because of this type of behavior from the Left. I’m glad to see he wasn’t seriously hurt. I just wanted to mention him because I was flabbergasted. Here’s the link to his interview on Fox Business: https://video.foxbusiness.com/v/6057202976001/fbclid=IwAR092zrv76HQblV5B417AXJXwxC63Oead7L5IMzMbkQU3eXBmg5ftF0ZaxE#sp=show-clips